Deviation without Contradiction in Adolf Reinach’s Ontology
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Inconsistency without Contradiction
1. Genuine worlds, ersatz worlds David Lewis has argued that impossible worlds are nonsense. 1 If there were such worlds, one would have to distinguish between the truths about their contradictory goings-on and contradictory falsehoods about them. One would have to distinguish between, say, the alleged truth (1a) In so-and-so world pigs can fly; and in that world pigs also cannot fly, and the c...
متن کاملsyntactic deviation in hafez poems
abstract the present study is concerned with the syntactic deviation in hafezs poetry. poems are known to be accompanied with various linguistic deviations. these deviations may be phonological, morphological and/or syntactic. the relatively high frequency of the cases of the syntactic deviation in hafezs poems makes this rhetorical feature as a main characteristic of his poetry. this thesis, ...
Contradiction Detection with Contradiction-Specific Word Embedding
Contradiction detection is a task to recognize contradiction relations between a pair of sentences. Despite the effectiveness of traditional context-based word embedding learning algorithms in many natural language processing tasks, such algorithms are not powerful enough for contradiction detection. Contrasting words such as “overfull” and “empty” are mostly mapped into close vectors in such e...
متن کاملOntology evolution without tears
The evolution of ontologies is an undisputed necessity in ontology-based data integration. Yet, few research efforts have focused on addressing the need to reflect the evolution of ontologies used as global schemata onto the underlying data integration systems. In most of these approaches, when ontologies change their relations with the data sources, i.e., the mappings, are recreated manually, ...
متن کاملContradiction in Argumentation Frameworks
We present a theory of argumentation that can deal with contradiction within an argumentation framework, thus solving a problem posed in [1]. By representing logic programs as sets of interacting arguments, we can apply our results for general argumentation frameworks to logicprogramming semantics. This yields a new semantics for logic programs that properly extends traditional approaches such ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica
سال: 2020
ISSN: 2450-2782,0208-6069
DOI: 10.18778/0208-6069.90.02